Crofter and farmer culture: implications  for agri-environment scheme
          Project Contact          
            
              Sally Huband 
             
            Project Summary
              Previous research at the Macaulay has  explored farmers’ cultural resistance to voluntary agri-environment schemes  (Burton et al., 2008). This work suggests that farmers can attain high social standing  or cultural capital amongst their peers by visibly demonstrating that they are  ‘good farmers’. For example, a field of healthy and weed free wheat with well executed  tram lines symbolises good farming and the successful application of a farmer’s  skills and knowledge. 
               In contrast, land managed for biodiversity  conservation, as part of an agri-environment agreement, may even symbolise poor  farming practice. Grass margins look unkempt in comparison to a well-managed  arable crop and provide little opportunity for a farmer to visibly demonstrate  skill and knowledge.  The prescriptive  approach of agri-environment schemes constrains a farmer’s ability to develop  the skills and knowledge necessary to achieve the desired conservation outcome.  This may prevent land management for biodiversity being incorporated into the  meanings attached to good farming.  
              This research investigates the meanings  attached to crofting and farming in areas in which farming and crofting  practices can be described as having a high nature value*. In these areas, it  is essential that crofters and farmers continue practices that are necessary  for the conservation of specific habitats and species. It is critical,  therefore, that voluntary agri-environment schemes in these areas do not  detract from farmers‘ and crofters’ cultural capital.   
                In-depth interviews with crofters and  farmers will allow a comparison of the meanings attached to crofting and farming  with the meanings attached to managing land for biodiversity conservation. Is  there any complementarity between these meanings or are they in conflict with  each other? Can agri-environment schemes be adapted to take in to account the  cultural meanings attached to farming and crofting?  
              References:
              
              - Burton, R.J.,  Kuczera, C. and Schwarz, G. (2008) Exploring Farmers’ Cultural Resistance to  Voluntary Agri-environmental Schemes. Sociologia Ruralis. Volume 48, pages  16-37. 
 
              - For information on the high nature value farming  concept and an example of high nature value farming in Scotland  visit the web pages of the European Forum on Nature Conservation and Pastoralism 
 
                           
             |